Create the ability to markup spec sections just like drawings. Many markups apply to both drawings and specs.

With the new Submittal PDF View rollout, PDFS attached to workflow responses are no longer linked at the bottom and only appear at the top in the "attachments" section. The ability to customize where attachments appear would be great, since our legal team prefers them next to the responses at the bottom.

Have the correspondence format identical to the bid format that shows the tab view and resend beside the vendors. When you add additional vendors to a bid invite, you must also go in and send the correspondence, but it brings up the whole bidders list. Would be nice to bring up the new vendor added

As a user, I would like to create custom logs in the Daily Log tool.

'global directory' where a sub/vendors can place their name, contact and trade(s) info to a nationwide database for GCs/Owners to pull.

Currently, the Extract feature pulls all data from a given tool. It would be beneficial if the data that is extracted could be specified by the user in order to maximize the efficiency of the Extracts tool (i.e excluding empty days from the Daily Log)

I would a feature to be able to mark a box to get notification for RFIs and Submittals approvals that were not submitted by me or that I am not on the distribution list. This would be in order to track items that will influence my scope of work.

Create an observation from Daily Logs if a sub has not created a time entry, Allow the observation manager to send this to the trade partner and the PM of that job.

There should be an ability to assign a task to multiple people. If a task is to be completed by multiple people, it helps.

Allow users to upload s stamp with fields/checkboxes where data can be entered.

-Response Checkboxes
-Signature
-Signature Date

As a user I would like to be able to link drawings to other tools without having to go to the drawing first to create a link. Adding a dropdown modal on the creation page of each tool to link a drawing would be helpful.

Please add the option to download attachments from multiple transmittals as a bulk action

bid package templates

Problem: When working on an Ipad in the drawings tool; when in a specific drawing, the search bar is in the way in landscape mode.

Context: Customer was getting frustrated that, it was in the way and he could not hide it.

Who is affected by this: standard , admin , subs, architects .

Proposed Solution: Be able to make the search bar hide-able.

We need the ability to claim (invoice) against unapproved head contract variations (PCCOs). This is important as it will allow cash flow on variations that are approved in principal, but not yet resolved.

For some inspections (e.g. pre-pour checklists, safety walks, etc) there are multiple trades involved. Rather than creating multiple inspections or simply tagging multiple trades in the header it would be most useful implementation of this would be assigning trades by section. The underlying issue is when an inspection has multiple sections for varying trades. Any observations created from a line item would inherit the assignee based on that sections responsible party rather than the inspection POC.

With the new Submittal markup feature, the ability to bulk download attachments no longer exists. This feature is incredibly crucial if team members need to download Submittal documents and there are 10-15 associated documents with each Submittal. It is time-consuming to make those downloads separately.

In Submittals --> View --> Submittal Workflow (section), make it so that the company name of the user is shown.

budget modifications in budget should be hyperlinked to CE #

The Uservoice platform supports an internal AND external roadmap feature. If Procore wants to join the big guns like Microsoft and Autodesk then how about letting us know what you're working on so we, the end users, can plan accordingly? While some suggestions/ideas are minor (e.g. allow custom required fields) others may require changes in workflow or new corporate policies. As a potential enterprise customer I think Procore owes it to the ENR100 type contractors as well as everyone else to show us where your priorities are.

https://www.uservoice.com/product/activate/

https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/roadmap/

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/roadmap?filters=

http://blogs.autodesk.com/bim360-roadmap/bim360-priorities/