Multiple Responsible Subcontractors for RFIs
Add multiple Responsible Subs to an RFI
Thank you for your feedback! We have shared your post with the development teams. We will update this space if we have any questions or change the status.
Ross Smith commented
No brainer - RFI direction typically has indirect impacts to multiple trades.
David Lohman commented
We have to use the assignee field in lieu to pull in additional persons.
Matthew Mitchell commented
How this was not already addressed?? But we need multiple "responsible contractor(S)" not just one. Thanks
In RFI section: there is a box to select " Responsible Contractor". we can only select one subcontractor for it. In some situtions more than one contractor is responsible for the job. so it would be great if you can add that option
Gabriela Kaniuga commented
This is extremely important. More often than not, there is more than one trade affected by a change. The need for this can not be overstated.
gary Chapman commented
As of now, you cannot tag multiple subs to the “Responsible Contractor” field. It is rare for an RFI to only affect one trade, so it would be very helpful to have this data for pricing and field coordination.
Sara Andon commented
I'm on a $107M project and currently have 690 RFIs and climbing. I have (3) engineers that work under me and some are in the process of learning how RFI changes affect different trade partners. Often times, the trader partner submitting the RFI is not the only trade affects.
I need the ability to add multiple subs to the "Responsible Contractor" field, so when I'm filtering RFIs, I can easily find RFIs related to that trade.