Rob Sloyer

My feedback

  1. 12 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  2. 64 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  3. 73 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  5. 128 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  6. 10 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer shared this idea  · 
  7. 27 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thank you for supporting this suggestion.

    The problem described indicates a need to add inspection items that are specific to a project. The part about adding items “on the go” suggests that these would be “one off” items that may be inspected once during a specific instance of an inspection, but would not be items that would be included in future instances of inspections utilizing the same template. Is this a correct assumption? It would be helpful if everyone could post some specific examples of scenarios where this functionality would be beneficial in order to provide context on the problem that needs to be solved and the possible solutions for addressing the problem.

    If these items would be included in future instances of inspections utilizing the same template, please note that inspection sections, items, and item details can be added to inspection templates from within the inspection configuration settings. This…

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  8. 126 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  9. 40 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  10. 12 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  11. 244 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  12. 32 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  13. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  14. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  15. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer shared this idea  · 
  16. 9 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rob Sloyer commented  · 

    The custom reporting (in the reports tool) is lacking for the CI. It needs to offer the ability to include:
    1) a link in the pdf export to the CI in question
    2) the CI # (I don't know how this isn't already a thing)
    3) the option to add the "activity" to the report
    4) Assignee company

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  17. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer shared this idea  · 
  18. 4 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  19. 40 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
  20. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Rob Sloyer supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 11 12

Feedback and Knowledge Base