Kurt Heitz

My feedback

  1. 158 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Many comments here relate to punch list “categories” or “groups”. There is a ‘Type’ field on Punch List that could potentially be leveraged to meet this need. You are able to filter and sort by Type on the Punch List list page or run a report in the Reports tools and filter, group, and sort punch items by Type.

    Some comments relate to “official” vs. “unofficial” punch lists. One potential option is to utilize the Observations tool for unofficial items and utilize the Punch List tool for official items.

    For situations where the owner/architect maintains a punch list outside of Procore with a unique numbering system, there is a ‘Reference’ field that could be used to refer to architect’s numbering system (e.g., HE001, PR001, LY001, SPR001).

    Kurt Heitz commented  · 

    organize punchlists into packages

    Kurt Heitz supported this idea  · 
  2. 37 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Kurt Heitz supported this idea  · 
  3. 199 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Kurt Heitz supported this idea  · 
  4. 102 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Kurt Heitz commented  · 

    When you export to PDF, it would be nice to have the option to Export with attachments combined into the pdf. this is helpful especially with PCOs and back up data.

    Kurt Heitz supported this idea  · 
  5. 478 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We currently have the first release that will begin to address bulk editing workflows ready – “Bulk Replace”. This functionality will allow a user to be replaced by another within the Submittals workflows.

    For the initial release, these edits can be requested via support and/or your account manager. Please reach out if you need to quickly replace users in a workflow. We fully intend to make this user-facing, but want to make sure it is working as requested.

    Please note, this currently only changes names, not dates.

    We are not stopping here, but feel this release will have a huge impact on the need to bulk edit workflows.

    Kurt Heitz supported this idea  · 
  6. 785 votes
    Sign in Sign in with: Procore Okta
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We wanted to take a minute to share more as this request is our top rated and we’re so grateful for the continued input that each of you provided. At Procore, our vision is to improve the lives of everyone in construction. Building software to improve the lives of all roles within construction is so important to us and we continue to pursue this every day. The opinions each of you share here is critical to helping us understand if we’re heading the right direction. So, thank you!

    We know this will be a very valuable feature and this is something that we’re actively working towards. There is some underlying technology that we need to improve before we feel confident to deliver a feature like this at the scale of supporting various roles and project types in construction. So while we may not yet be able to update this ticket…

    Kurt Heitz commented  · 

    Mark ups for specifications would be amazing. With owners and architects changing their minds faster and faster as we advance into the world of information technology. we need to keep up with the mark ups.

    thanks,

    Kurt Heitz supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base